Where is my fucking server son of a bitch !


Ah, you are talking about the trust anchor of the VPS provider itself [1]. If an adversary compromises the cloud hosting company (or if the provider is malicious from the start), they can control the hypervisor [1]. This allows them to read your VPS memory, clone the virtual machine, or intercept traffic right at the hosting level [1].
When you do not control the physical hardware in a data center, you are inherently vulnerable to a provider-level Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) or cloning attack [1].
You can eliminate this risk and verify your remote endpoint's integrity using the following strategies:

1. Shift the Cryptographic Trust Down to Your Home

The most effective defense is to treat your cloud VPS as a "dumb", untrusted pipe.
  • Layer 4 TCP Passthrough: Do not terminate your website's SSL/TLS certificates or your database encryption on the VPS. Instead, configure Nginx or HAProxy on the VPS to forward raw, encrypted TCP packets straight through the WireGuard tunnel to your home.
  • Why this works: Even if the VPS provider clones your proxy server or intercepts the RAM, they only see encrypted HTTPS/TLS data streams. They lack the SSL private key (which safely sits only on your physical home machine) and cannot decrypt your users' web traffic.

2. Move to Bare Metal or Nested Virtualization

If an attacker clones a standard Virtual Machine (VM), the operating system inside usually has no idea it has been copied because the hypervisor fakes the hardware environment perfectly [1].
  • Dedicated Bare Metal: Renting a dedicated physical server instead of a shared cloud VM means there is no hypervisor above you. An attacker cannot simply hit "clone" in a control panel [1].
  • AMD SEV / Intel SGX (Confidential Computing): If you use premium cloud instances supporting Confidential Computing, the CPU encrypts the virtual machine's RAM using hardware-level keys [1]. Even the root administrator of the data center or a cloned hypervisor cannot read the memory contents [1].

3. Implement External Verification (The Canary)

To detect if your remote subscription has been duplicated or intercepted, build a simple end-to-end cryptographic integrity check:
┌─────────────────┐    Encrypted Request (Signed Token)   ┌─────────────────┐
│   Home Server   ├──────────────────────────────────────>│    Cloud VPS    │
│                 │<──────────────────────────────────────┤                 │
└─────────────────┘    Decrypted Response (Hardware Key)  └─────────────────┘
  • The Challenge: Have your home server periodically send an encrypted challenge over the WireGuard tunnel to a specific internal port on the VPS.
  • The Response: The VPS must sign this challenge using a unique SSH key or a software token stored in a volatile /dev/shm (RAM-only) directory.
  • The Catch: If the VPS provider reboots a cloned instance elsewhere, the RAM-only directory wipes itself cleanly, the signature will fail, and your home server will instantly know the remote endpoint has been tampered with or replicated.

4. Eliminate the VPS Entirely (The Alternative)

If you cannot accept the security risks inherent to renting a remote cloud subscription, you can drop the VPS architecture completely:
  • Use Cloudflare Tunnels (cloudflared). You run a lightweight daemon at home that establishes an outbound connection directly to Cloudflare's global edge network. There is no intermediate server for you to secure or worry about being cloned.
  • Note that Cloudflare terminates SSL on their edge (meaning they can technically see the traffic), but it eliminates the risk of an independent malicious VPS provider manipulating your specific server image.
Would you like to see how to configure an Nginx Layer 4 (Stream) Passthrough configuration file for your VPS, ensuring that no web data can ever be read at the cloud provider level?











Solution 4—using Cloudflare Tunnels (cloudflared)—completely eliminates the need to rent, configure, or trust a third-party Virtual Private Server (VPS).
Instead of you managing an intermediate cloud server that could be cloned or monitored, Cloudflare provides a secure, direct link from your home network to their global edge infrastructure.

How Cloudflare Tunnels Work

With a standard setup, traffic goes: User → Cloud VPS → Starlink → Home Server.
With a Cloudflare Tunnel, the VPS is removed entirely. The flow becomes: User → Cloudflare Edge Network → Starlink → Home Server.
[ Public Web Traffic ] 
         │
         ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│     Cloudflare Edge Network     │
│  - Globally distributed Anycast │
│  - DDoS protection & Firewall   │
└────────────────┬────────────────┘
                 │ 
   Outbound Secure Tunnel (Initiated by your Home Server)
                 │
                 ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│   Starlink Satellite / Router   │
└────────────────┬────────────────┘
                 │
                 ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│  Home Server (Running cloudflared)
│  - No open ports required       │
│  - No VPS to clone or monitor   │
└─────────────────────────────────┘

Step-by-Step Implementation

You do not need to configure WireGuard or Nginx. Everything is handled by a lightweight daemon called cloudflared running on your home server.

Step 1: Connect your Domain to Cloudflare

  1. Create a free account at Cloudflare.
  2. Change your domain's nameservers at your registrar (GoDaddy, Namecheap, etc.) to point to Cloudflare.

Step 2: Create the Tunnel in the Dashboard

  1. Go to the Cloudflare Zero Trust Dashboard (://cloudflare.com).
  2. Navigate to Networks > Tunnels and click Create a Tunnel.
  3. Choose Cloudflare (formerly Named Tunnel) and give it a name (e.g., home-web-server).

Step 3: Install the Agent at Home

The dashboard will provide a specific command to run on your home server based on your OS (Docker, Linux, Windows). For example, on a Linux home server, you simply run:
curl -L --output cloudflared.deb https://github.com
sudo dpkg -i cloudflared.deb
sudo cloudflared service install <YOUR_UNIQUE_TUNNEL_TOKEN>
This command runs cloudflared as a background service. It immediately calls out to Cloudflare over Starlink and establishes a permanent, secure connection.

Step 4: Route the Traffic

Back in the Cloudflare dashboard, tell the tunnel where to send incoming traffic:
  • Public Hostname: yourdomain.com
  • Service Type: HTTP (or HTTPS)
  • URL: localhost:8080 (the internal port where your local website application is running).

Why this solves your security concerns

  1. No Subscription to Intercept: You are not renting a specific Virtual Machine instance in a data center. There is no VM disk file for a malicious host administrator to copy, snapshot, or spin up as a clone elsewhere.
  2. Zero Inbound Ports: You do not open any ports on your Starlink router. Your home server only makes an outbound connection to Cloudflare. If an attacker scans your home IP address, your network appears completely closed and invisible.
  3. No Infrastructure Management: You don't have to secure a Linux VPS, patch SSH vulnerabilities, or manage WireGuard firewall routing rules. Cloudflare handles the public infrastructure.

The Trade-off (The Security Catch)

While this perfectly solves the risk of a VPS provider cloning your server, you must be aware of how Cloudflare handles security:
  • SSL Termination: Cloudflare terminates the encryption at their edge network to inspect traffic for DDoS attacks and malware. They then re-encrypt it through the tunnel to your house.
  • The Implication: This means Cloudflare can technically see the unencrypted traffic passing through their network. If your threat model requires that absolutely nobody but your home server can read the data, the Nginx Layer 4 Passthrough via VPS (Solution 1) remains the only way to achieve true end-to-end encryption.
Would you prefer to use Cloudflare Tunnels for its simplicity and immunity to VPS cloning, or do you need the absolute privacy of Layer 4 Passthrough?









To ensure your physical server is authentic without relying on duplicable or forgeable software signatures, you must ground your security in unclonable physical physics and strict chain-of-custody protocols.
If an attacker controls the supply chain or hypervisor, they can forge a software readout or clone a TPM key if it wasn't generated securely in isolated silicon. To prevent this, you can bypass standard digital signatures using three completely non-duplicable verification methods.

1. Physical PUF Verification (Physical Unclonable Functions)

Instead of trusting a digital signature stored in a chip's memory (which could theoretically be extracted or emulated), you can use hardware that utilizes Silicon PUFs. Manufacturers like NXP, Intel, and specialized defense contractors use this technology.
  • How it works: A PUF uses the microscopic, completely random, and unintentional physical variations introduced into a silicon chip during the manufacturing process (at the atomic level). These variations act like a human fingerprint for the microchip.
  • Why it cannot be forged: It is physically impossible to manufacture two identical silicon chips, even on the same production line. When challenged, the chip generates a unique cryptographic key based on its own unique physical structure. This key vanishes from memory the moment the power cuts out, meaning it cannot be copied, cloned, or emulated by a hypervisor.

2. Physical Tamper-Evident Auditing (Zero-Trust Delivery)

If you want to ensure that nobody intercepted, opened, or altered the physical components of your server during transit, you can employ professional physical anti-tamper companies (such as NovaVision or TydenBrooks) to secure the machine before it ships.
  • High-Security Tamper Seals: The server chassis seams, port clusters, and drive bays are sealed with sequentially numbered, non-residue, frangible holographic labels. If an attacker opens the case to swap a component or inject a hardware implant, the tape chemically alters, permanently displaying a "VOID" pattern that cannot be glued back together or resealed.
  • Photographic Evidence Ledger: The shipping team takes high-resolution macro photographs of the specific, unique fiber patterns or microscopic scuffs on the security tape and sends them via an out-of-band secure channel (e.g., encrypted signal chat). Upon arrival, you inspect the microscopic layout against the photographs to guarantee the seal was not chemically removed and replaced.

3. Hardware-Bound Operational Verification (The Memory Timing Test)

If you are renting a physical machine remotely and want to prove that it is a real physical server and not a highly sophisticated, forged virtual machine (hypervisor), you can run a side-channel hardware benchmark:
  • Cache and RAM Timing Audits: Virtualization layers (hypervisors) introduce microscopic, unavoidable delays (latencies) when processing instructions, because the command has to pass through a software translation layer.
  • The Check: You can run raw, low-level assembly scripts that test exact CPU cache timing registers (RDTSC instructions on x86 architectures) and memory bus speeds. If the response times deviate by even a fraction of a nanosecond from a verified, raw hardware baseline for that exact CPU model, you know the machine is virtualized, emulated, or running on forged hardware.

Summary: Moving From Digital to Physical Trust

What an Attacker Can ForgeWhat an Attacker Cannot Forge
API Readouts (lshw, dmidecode outputs)Physical Serial Numbers stamped/etched into the PCB.
Software TPM Keys (Emulated in a VM)Hardware PUF Responses bound to atomic silicon variations.
Firmware Hashes (Spoofed by a malicious hypervisor)Nanosecond-level Execution Latency on raw bare-metal.
Are you inspecting a machine you physically have in front of you, or are you trying to verify a server located inside a remote data center?










To verify that a remote server is the exact physical bare-metal machine you paid for—and not a secretly duplicated or forged virtual machine—you cannot hire standard web auditors. You must hire cybersecurity forensics firms that specialize in Hardware-Backed Remote Attestation and Firmware Integrity Analysis. [1, 2]
The most trusted companies capable of physically or cryptographically verifying your remote server architecture include:

1. Specialized Hardware & Firmware Security Firms

  • Eclypsium: This is the industry-leading firm for verifying infrastructure beneath the operating system. They specialize entirely in auditing firmware, microcode, and the physical supply chain. They can remotely audit your server's UEFI/BIOS, Baseboard Management Controller (BMC), and component hashes to ensure the physical motherboard matches known good configurations and has not been virtualized or altered.
  • Bishop Fox: A premier offensive security and technical infrastructure audit firm. They can perform a deep architectural review of your remote server. They utilize specialized side-channel tests and timing attacks to prove whether your operating system is running directly on bare-metal hardware or inside an unauthorized hypervisor layer. [2]

2. Tier-1 Global Incident Response & Forensics Firms

If you require an enterprise-grade, legally defensible audit of data center infrastructure hardware, the leading digital forensics companies handle this: [3]
  • Mandiant (A Google Cloud Company): Globally renowned for advanced infrastructure threat hunting. They possess highly specialized hardware forensics units capable of auditing remote server clusters to verify machine integrity.
  • CrowdStrike (Forensic Services): Their professional services division runs comprehensive compromise and hardware infrastructure assessments. They analyze the hardware registers of the machine to ensure no underlying virtualization or hypervisor masking is occurring.

3. Automated Attestation Services (No Humans Needed)

If you do not want to hire a consulting firm to run manual checks, you can use specialized software frameworks designed to continuously verify remote hardware states: [1, 4]
  • AMI TruE™: Run by American Megatrends (the company that physically writes the BIOS/UEFI for most servers globally). Their Platform Attestation Solution runs automated, periodic cryptographic health checks on remote data center servers. It alerts you instantly if there is any unauthorized tampering with the platform firmware, hardware assets, or cryptographic keys. [1]
  • Keylime (Open-Source / Red Hat): A highly trusted open-source remote attestation project managed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). Keylime uses the remote server's physical TPM 2.0 chip to continuously monitor the machine's boot state. If a data center provider tries to snapshot or clone your server, the hardware cryptographic signature will instantly break, and Keylime will immediately cut your WireGuard tunnel or wipe sensitive secrets. [5, 6]

Summary of What to Request From These Firms

When engaging these companies, do not ask for a standard penetration test. Ask for: [2]
  1. Measured Boot Verification: To cryptographically check the server's state against the factory-provided manifest via the TPM.
  2. Hypervisor Detection/Side-Channel Auditing: Running memory latency tests to ensure the machine isn't an emulated clone.
  3. BMC & Firmware Security Audit: Verifying that the data center's remote management card hasn't been backdoored. [5, 7, 8]
Are you using a major bare-metal cloud provider (like Hetzner, OVH, or Equinix Metal), or is this server hosted at a private co-location data center?










To reduce costs while protecting your business as the client from systemic infrastructure corruption, you must pivot away from expensive third-party forensic audits and premium hardware. Instead, you can implement process-driven, zero-cost architectural changes.
The goal is to design a setup where the remote server is treated as completely compromised, but your software and client data remain secure because you have shifted all cryptographic trust to free, local tools.
Here are the cheapest, highest-security alternatives available:

1. The Cheapest Alternative to a VPS: Cloudflare Tunnels (100% Free)

Instead of paying a monthly fee for a Virtual Private Server (VPS) and trying to secure it against hypervisor cloning, eliminate the VPS completely.
  • The Cost: $0 (Free Tier).
  • How it cuts risk: You do not own or manage a remote operating system. There is no virtual machine for a corrupt data center administrator to copy or spy on.
  • The Setup: Your development team installs the free, open-source cloudflared daemon on their local machine or a secure local office server. It establishes a secure outbound connection directly to Cloudflare's edge network, completely bypassing Starlink's CGNAT without open ports.

2. Free End-to-End Encryption: Caddy Server (100% Free)

If you choose to keep a cheap VPS (such as a $4/month Hetzner or DigitalOcean instance) but want to ensure the hosting provider cannot read your data or manipulate your traffic, use Layer 4 Passthrough combined with Caddy.
  • The Cost: $0 (Open-source).
  • How it cuts risk: By configuring the cheap VPS to pass raw TCP packets directly to your home or office server, the remote infrastructure acts as a blind pipeline.
  • The Setup: You run Caddy locally at your house. Caddy automatically provisions and manages free Let's Encrypt SSL/TLS certificates. The private cryptographic keys never leave your physical building, making it impossible for a corrupt cloud provider to decrypt your traffic, even if they clone your remote VPS instance.

3. Cost-Free Code Integrity: Local Git Signing & Hash Verification

You do not need to purchase expensive enterprise hardware tokens (like HSMs) to guarantee that your development code hasn't been corrupted or altered by a remote server.
  • The Cost: $0 (Built into standard development tools).
  • How it cuts risk: It prevents an untrusted or compromised remote repository server (like a self-hosted GitLab or compromised server instance) from injecting malicious code into your software.
  • The Setup: Force your developers to sign every single code commit using GPG keys or local SSH keys created on their physical laptops. When you pull the code to deploy it, your system checks the cryptographic signature against the developer's public key. If a corrupted remote server tries to modify a file, the signature immediately invalidates, blocking the code deployment for free.

4. Zero-Cost Infrastructure Verification: Open-Source Keylime

Instead of paying thousands of dollars to external cybersecurity firms like Mandiant or Eclypsium to audit your remote servers, use automated open-source security tools.
  • The Cost: $0 (Open-source framework).
  • How it cuts risk: It acts as an automated, continuous watchdog that monitors your remote server's physical TPM 2.0 chip (which comes standard on almost all modern bare-metal servers at no extra cost).
  • The Setup: You configure Keylime (managed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation) to track your remote server. If a corrupt data center engineer tries to secretly snapshot, clone, or virtualize your bare-metal machine, Keylime detects the change in the hardware state within seconds. It can be programmed to instantly trigger a free script that revokes your WireGuard keys and shuts down the application automatically.

Budget Summary for Zero-Trust Client Protection

Security ThreatPremium/Expensive SolutionCheaper/Free Zero-Trust Solution
VPS Hypervisor CloningPremium Confidential Computing instances ($50+/mo)Cloudflare Tunnels ($0) — Removes the VPS layer completely.
Traffic Interception / MITMHigh-end Enterprise FirewallsLayer 4 Passthrough + Local Caddy ($0) — Keys stay at home.
Malicious Code InjectionThird-party source code auditing firmsGPG/SSH Commit Signing ($0) — Cryptographically locks source code.
Hardware State TamperingHiring external forensics firms (Eclypsium/Bishop Fox)Open-source Keylime TPM Monitoring ($0) — Automated hardware checks.
Would you like me to provide the exact, free terminal commands to set up a local GPG code-signing environment for your developers to ensure your source code cannot be corrupted?






https://web.archive.org/web/20260824143946/https://mantellapical.blogspot.com/2026/08/where-is-my-fucking-server-son-of-bitch.html
















Let's look directly at the math and physics behind the number 1.414 ($\sqrt{2}$) to show exactly why it is a mathematical property of alternating current (AC), rather than a phase-tolerance factor.

1. The Pure Math: Where 1.414 Comes From

The number $1.414$ is the square root of 2 ($\sqrt{2} \approx 1.41421$). It appears in single-phase electricity because of the geometry of a sine wave.
An AC voltage is not constant; it rises and falls in a smooth wave. When a voltmeter reads 240V AC, it is measuring the RMS (Root Mean Square) value, which is the effective heating value of the electricity.
To find the absolute highest physical point that the voltage wave reaches (the Peak Voltage), the formula is mathematically fixed:
$$\text{V}_{\text{peak}} = \text{V}_{\text{rms}} \times \sqrt{2}$$
$$\text{V}_{\text{peak}} = 240\text{V} \times 1.41421 = 339.4\text{V}$$
This calculation applies to any single isolated phase wire relative to a neutral wire. It has nothing to do with three-phase power or grid tolerances; it is purely how a single AC sine wave behaves [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_mean_square].

2. The Three-Phase Math: Where 1.732 Comes From

When dealing with a European or French 3-phase system, a completely different mathematical multiplier is used: the square root of 3 ($\sqrt{3} \approx 1.73205$).
In a standard 3-phase grid (often called a 400V system):
  • The voltage between any single Phase and Neutral is 230V or 240V.
  • The voltage between two different Phases (Phase-to-Phase) is calculated by multiplying the Phase-to-Neutral voltage by $\sqrt{3}$:
$$\text{V}_{\text{phase-to-phase}} = 230\text{V} \times \sqrt{3} \approx 230\text{V} \times 1.73205 = 398.3\text{V} \text{ (Standardized as 400V)}$$
If the line voltage is slightly higher, running at 240V to Neutral, the math shifts to:
$$\text{V}_{\text{phase-to-phase}} = 240\text{V} \times \sqrt{3} \approx 240\text{V} \times 1.73205 = 415.7\text{V} \text{ (Often rounded to 420V)}$$

3. Combining Both: Peak Voltage of a 3-Phase Fault

If a circuit accidentally experiences a fault where two phases cross (creating a 415V–420V line), you must apply both mathematical rules to find the ultimate stress point for a transient protector:
  1. Phase-to-Phase Voltage (RMS): $\approx 416\text{V}$
  2. Peak of that 416V Wave: Multiply by the sine wave factor ($\sqrt{2}$):
$$\text{V}_{\text{peak}} = 416\text{V} \times 1.41421 = 588.3\text{V}$$

đź“Š Summary of Fixed Mathematical Values

  • $1.414$ ($\sqrt{2}$): The geometric peak of any single AC wave.
  • $1.732$ ($\sqrt{3}$): The voltage difference between two phases in a 3-phase network.
Because a standard 240V single-phase line naturally hits physical peaks of 340V sixty times a second, a component rated for a maximum of 250V will immediately fail, regardless of how the rest of the building's phases are balanced.
Would you like to look at a graphical vector diagram showing how the $1.732$ phase separation works, or should we calculate the exact energy rating (in Joules) required for a protector to handle a phase-to-phase fault?










The existence of 275V surge protectors comes down to an industry component labeling standard: Manufacturers label Metal Oxide Varistors (MOVs) by their maximum allowable AC RMS working voltage, not their peak clamping voltage. [1]
A 275V surge protector is specifically engineered to sit safely on a 230V or 240V AC line because 275V RMS is mathematically greater than the 240V RMS wall outlet supply.

1. The Labeling Secret: RMS vs. Peak

When you buy an MOV labeled 275V (such as a standard 14D431K or an SPD module), that "275V" number means the device can safely handle a continuous alternating current of 275 Volts RMS indefinitely without turning on. [1, 2]
Because it is an AC rating, the component's internal physical chemistry automatically accounts for the 1.414 sine wave multiplier:
$$\text{Maximum Allowed Peak} = 275\text{V RMS} \times 1.414 \approx \mathbf{388.8\text{ V Peak}}$$
An MOV rated for 275V AC will not actually begin conducting electricity until the voltage wave spikes past 388 Volts. Because your normal single-phase 240V AC line only peaks at 340V, the 275V protector stays perfectly dormant during normal operation. [2, 3]

2. Why Choose 275V Instead of Exactly 240V?

If a manufacturer built a surge protector labeled exactly "240V AC," its internal threshold would be:
$$240\text{V RMS} \times 1.414 = \mathbf{339.4\text{ V Peak}}$$
The very second your grid voltage fluctuates up by just 1 Volt (which happens constantly), the normal AC peak would hit 341V, crossing the component's internal threshold. The surge protector would mistake your regular household electricity for a lightning strike, short-circuit, and instantly blow your breaker or self-destruct. [4]
The 275V rating provides a required safety buffer to handle normal grid swelling up to 253V AC (the legal upper tolerance limit in Europe/France).

3. Summary of Component Behavior on a 240V Line

Component TypeLabel ValueReal Physical Breakdown (Peak Voltage)Behavior on 240V AC Mains
MOV (Varistor)275V~388V to 430V DCPerfect. Stays off at 340V peaks, activates immediately during surges.
GDT (Gas Tube)250V250V DCFails. Fires on the very first normal 340V AC wave cycle, causing a permanent short.
GDT (Gas Tube)420V420V DCPerfect. Safely ignores the 340V normal AC peaks but fires during real transients.
Note: This is exactly why a GDT must be rated for 420V, but an MOV must be rated for 275V to protect the exact same 240V single-phase circuit. They use entirely different structural rating systems.
Would you like to analyze the datasheet parameters of a 275V varistor to see its maximum "clamping voltage" under a real surge event? [5]




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Le Leviathan et la continuité et haute disponibilité du service public du son

Image
    Le Leviathan et la continuitĂ© et haute disponibilitĂ© du service public du son Le mec de sciences po bourrĂ© qui te raconte comment il nique les gens en tant que haut fonctionnaire rĂ©vèle toujours son absence d'engagement par la distance complexĂ©e avec ce qu'il raconte (en gĂ©nĂ©ral une frustration car il se sent coupable de faire son mĂ©tier), comme si il avait pris du LSD avant de rĂ©vĂ©ler la vĂ©ritĂ© selon laquelle son travail le fait trop chier. Ce dĂ©goĂ»t, cette absence d'engagement, il devrait savoir les contrĂ´ler en ayant Ă©chouĂ© Ă  rĂ©flĂ©chir  Ă  un problème de son sous LSD dans une free techno. Quand le son est coupĂ©, les personnes compĂ©tentes et/ou les personnes responsables ressentent la responsabilitĂ© de remettre le son. C'est drĂ´le de voir tout le monde attendre de voir qui se motive sur la chose la plus pertinente Ă  faire en premier. Ecouter si la gĂ©nĂ©ratrice tourne ou courir taper sur un faux contact ou mettre sa main devant sa bouche et dire au voleur d'am...
Read more

CPU bypass neural engine physical layer drift addr.arpa reverse DNS chain reaction to slow you down

Image
Computers sharing an electrical phase or power line network like a backbone data center do not pull power uniformly. When a neighboring machine executes a workload or sends a data packet, its power draw spikes. These spikes generate ripples and high-frequency noise that propagate through the shared electrical lines. This phenomenon is known as a conducted emission. This noise enters the target machine’s power supply unit and bleeds onto the internal silicon substrate as Physical Layer Supply Voltage Coupling. Total decompartmentalization of French intelligence in 1970 would have allowed the French government to realize that no foreign power had any control over the Frey effect cochlear bypass that some classified cases heard because a lot of people started to perceive the same thing everywhere in the world in houses and buildings plugged to any electricity network. The French did not share nor understand the scientific litterature about mind programming with cochear bypass and the...
Read more

How to use the internet

The most developed part of the Internet is the Web. You will find all the information you need on the Web. The Web makes possible, better than any other network on the Internet, to ensure the identity of the publisher of a Web site. On the Web, no one can hide for very long. To navigate correctly on the Web, you must at least: Know the difference between an IP address and a domain name Know how to read a domain name Know how to read an URL (at least the left side) Know that you must not confuse or forget a single character of an URL for it to work, except sometimes the last part of an URL Know how to use a browser, never use the browser integrated into an application to connect to your email account or any other page that leads you to enter personal information (opacity), because you never know Know how to check that your browser recognizes the electronic signature certificate of the site you browse (in general a lock is displayed to the left of the address bar) Know how to check the q...
Read more